检察机关全程同步录音录像的证据性质研究

摘要

现在我国的全程同步录音录像的技术已经发展的很好了，并且已经在我国的侦查机关以及检察机关等等的司法机关实施，成为了我国的案件审理的过程中的重要的证据之一，并且这种审讯的手段已经获得了我国的法律的支持，但是我国的检察机关的全程同步的录音录像还仅仅处于建设阶段，依然存在着很多的问题，所以现在关于检察机全程录音录像的证据的性质的意见就不同意，阻碍了很多的案件的审理，本文终于要就是针对检察机关全程同步录音录像的证据性质研究 ，在研究的过程中简单的介绍了检察机关全程同步录音录像的建设，以及检察机关全程同步录音录像的证据性质的现状和存在的问题，并且针对检察机关全程同步录音录像的证据性质存在的问题做出了立法的完善、操作的规范化的建议，希望通过本文的研究能够提高人们对于检察机关全程同步录音录像的证据性质的关注度。

关键词：检察机关；全程同步；录音录像；证据性质

Abstract

Now the whole China's synchronous recording technology has been developed very well, and has been implemented in our investigation and procuratorial organs and judicial organs, become one of the important evidence of the process of China's trial in the trial, and this means China has gained the support of the law however, China's procuratorial organs of the whole synchronous recording is only in the construction stage, there are still many problems, so now the nature of the procuratorial organs is the entire audio and video evidence of the views do not agree with a lot of obstacles, the trial of the case, this paper is to study the nature of evidence and finally to full synchronization of procuratorial organs video recording, in the course of the study introduces the procuratorial organs of audio and video recording in the construction, and the procuratorial organs throughout the video recording evidence of synchronization The current situation and existing problems, and make the perfection of the legislation for the nature of evidence prosecutors audio and video recording in the problem, the normalization of operation suggestions, this paper hopes to raise awareness for the evidence nature of audio and video recording in the procuratorial organs.

Key words: procuratorial organs; synchronization; video recording; nature of evidence

目录

摘要 I

引言 1

一、全程同步录音录像证据性质研究的理论基础 2

（一）建设的背景 2

（二）概念的界定 2

二、检察机关全程同步录音录像证据性质的现状及问题 4

（一）检察机关全程同步录音录像证据性质的现状 4

（二）检察机关全程同步录音录像证据性质的现状的问题 4

1检察机关全程同步录音录像不规范 4

2司法的不健全 5

三、检察机关全程同步录音录像证据完善的措施 6

（一）立法的完善 6

（二）操作的规范化 6

四、结论 8

参考文献 9

致谢 10