浅析简·奥斯汀《傲慢与偏见》中的婚姻观开题报告

It is believed that listening, speaking, reading, and writing are four basic skills in language teaching and learning. Sequentially, listening is essential for developing other skills and provides a basis for language learning. The famous linguistician, Rivers(1984), has offered us a set of data in his works: In people daily communicative activities,45% rely on listening; only 30% depend on speaking;16% come  from reading and 9% rely on writing. It is obvious that listening plays the leading role in language learning. 

In recent years，Almost all the English teaching books have the leading thought of listening and speaking first and reading and writing to catch up from beginning to end, which stresses the importance of listening in English teaching. In the meantime, Many experts and scholars have done o lot of studies on listening strategies from all aspects .

Sir Walter Scott said that read again, and for the third time at least, Miss Austen's very finely written novel of "Pride and Prejudice." That young lady has a talent for describing the involvements and feelings and characters of ordinary life which is to me the most wonderful I ever met with. The big bow-wow strain I can do myself like any now going; but the exquisite touch, which renders ordinary commonplace things and characters interesting, from the truth of the description and the sentiment, is denied to me. — From "The Journal of Sir Walter Scott," March, 1826.

    We bestow no mean compliment upon the author of "Emma" when we say that keeping close to common incidents, and to such characters as occupy the ordinary walks of life, she has produced sketches of such spirit and originality that we never miss the excitation which depends upon a narrative of uncommon events, arising from the consideration of minds, manners, and sentiments, greatly above our own. In this class she stands almost alone; for the scenes of Miss Edgeworth are laid in higher life, varied by more romantic incident, and by her remarkable power of embodying and illustrating national character. But the author of "Emma" confines herself chiefly to the middling classes of society; her most distinguished characters do not rise greatly above well-bred country gentlemen and ladies; and those which are sketched with most originality and precision, belong to a class rather below that standard. The narrative of all her novels is composed of such common occurrences as may have fallen under the observation of most folks; and her dramatis person conduct themselves upon the motives and principles which the readers may recognize as ruling their own, and that of most of their own acquaintances.—From "The Quarterly Review," October, 1815.

Lord Macaulay points out that Shakespeare has had neither equal nor second. But among the writers who, in the point which we have noticed, have approached nearest to the manner of the great master we have no hesitation in placing Jane Austen, a woman of whom England is justly proud. She has given us a multitude of characters, all, in a certain sense, commonplace, all such as we meet every day. Yet they are all as perfectly discriminated from each other as if they were the most eccentric of human beings. There are, for example, four clergymen, none of whom we should be surprised to find in any parsonage in the kingdom—Mr. Edward Ferrars, Mr. Henry Tilney, Mr. Edmund Bertram, and Mr. Elton. They are all specimens of the upper part of the middle class. They have all been liberally educated. They all lie under the restraints of the same sacred profession. They are all young. They are all in love. Not one of them has any hobby-horse, to use the phrase of Sterne. Not one has a ruling passion, such as we read of in Pope. Who would not have expected them to be insipid likenesses of each other? No such thing. Harpagon is not more unlike to Jourdain, Joseph Surface is not more unlike to Sir Lucius O'Trigger, than every one of Miss Austen's young divines to all his reverend brethren. And almost all this is done by touches so delicate that they elude analysis, that they defy the powers of description, and that we know them to exist only by the general effect to which they have contributed. —From essay on "Madame D'Arblay," 1843.

Content

I.  Introduction

i.  Brief Story

II. The backgrounds and different states of this novel

Marriage is the only way for women to gain respect.

Different points of marriage lead to different marital states

Different views of marriage

i. The view of marriage at that time

ii. Austin's view of marriage

iii. Different views of marriage in modern times

IV.  The inspiration of Austen's view of marriage to us

V.  Conclusion

VI.  References

References

[1] shan huifang. Study on tea culture in pride and prejudice [J]. Fujian tea,2017,39(12):332-333.

[2] Huang Yan. Study on Women's Position in Pride and Prejudice [J]. Chinese Construction,2017(30):25-26.

[3] Wang Shu. On the Discourse of Characters in Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Pragmatics [J]. Chinese Construction,2017(33):56-57.

[4] Sun Yajuan. Analysis of The Film Clips of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Conceptual function Theory [J]. House of Drama,2018(03):194.

[5] Wu Tong. The view of love and marriage in Pride and Prejudice and its Enlightenment to contemporary People [J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2015,33(01):66-71.

[6] Liu Meishu. Reflection expression of Healing Films -- Pride and Prejudice adapted from literature [J]. Film Review,2017(22):88-90.

[7] He Xinshuang. Beyond the Ideal Realm of Money -- A Brief Analysis of marriage View in Pride and Prejudice [J]. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational College,2017(12):73-74+77.

[8] Ren Jing. Study on the Influence of Context on the Translation of Foreign Literary Works -- Taking Pride and Prejudice as an example [J]. English Abroad,2018(02):150-151.

[9] Yang Dong, An Qi. Dramatic Scenes in Pride and Prejudice [J]. Literary Contention,2018(02):173-178.

[10] Gu Hanyi. An Analysis of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of complementary Semantics and Pragmatics [J]. Intelligence, 2018 (01) : 182.

[11] Wu Minghong. A Brief Analysis of characters' personalities and Views on marriage in Pride and Prejudice [J]. Modern Communication,2017(17):91.

[12] Chen Ying. On Elizabeth's Female Writing in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice [J]. Journal of Heihe University, 2008,9(01):163-164.

[13] Wang Xiuxiu, Qu Hong. Implicit Androcentrism -- Symptomatic Interpretation of Pride and Prejudice [J]. Journal of Hubei Correspondence University, 2008,31(04):180-181.

[14] Yang Qianqian, Wang Qingyong. Analysis and Comparison of Frost Heights and Pride and Prejudice [J]. Appreciation of Masterpieces,2018(12):64-66.

[15] Liu Guangqing. Interpretation of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Feminism [J]. Journal of Hubei Correspondence University, 2012,31(06):191-192.

[16] Umbrella Yuqing. On the Differences between Marriage Modes in Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion [J]. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational College,2018(03):122.

[17] Ma Yichao. A comparison between the heroines of Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre [J]. Agricultural Staff,2018(07):270.

[18] Fan Lina. The Inheritance and Development of Female Consciousness in English Literature -- On Pride and Prejudice. Chinese Journal of Education,2018(05):126.

[19] Lin Shuqin. Study on the Person-to-person Threat to the Audience's face in the Context of The Dialogue of Pride and Prejudice [J]. Journal of Hebei North University (Social Science edition), 2008,34(02):80-82+88.

[20] Long Lu. Translation of Humor from the Perspective of Nida's Functional Equivalence Theory -- A Case Study of Pride and Prejudice [J]. English abroad,2018(07):146-147.